Comics I Don’t Understand – This site is now being updated daily at Please change your bookmark if necessary, and notify any web site with a link to the old address.

May 31, 2007

Latest Crimeweek Stuff

  • new Prosecuting the Prosecutors
  • Charles Manson Doesn’t Get His Parole, Syidah Mateen Gets Her Koran, Three Underage Store Detectives Get What Other People Stole First, and Katrina Gets Dissed
  • Cocaine Drinks, Droopy Drawers, Dead Alligators and More
  • Deer John: Improper uses of the ACLU and the Freedom of Information Act, and a VERY improper use of a dead deer
  • Advertisements


    1. Bill,

      In “What’s A Judge To Do?” you seem to be unaware of a point of law: a defendant is not permitted to challenge a verdict based on his own bad acts in court. If he attacks a juror and prejudices their opinion of him, its’ considered to be his own bad act and therefore the verdict is not reversible on these grounds, barring some more subtle point.

      Comment by Carl — June 4, 2007 @ 12:09 am

    2. That’s a matter of common law rather than a legal precedent, though: The defense can argue that the jury was clearly afraid of the defendant and that the judge had a clear remedy (new trial). Appeals have been won on shakier grounds, as you know.

      Comment by cidutest — June 4, 2007 @ 12:53 am

    RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

    Leave a Reply

    Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

    Google photo

    You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

    Connecting to %s

    Create a free website or blog at

    %d bloggers like this: