Maybe it’s a guy thing, but I can’t even begin to see the internal logic here: Val accidentally came to work wearing pajamas and convinced her boss that they weren’t actually pajamas, and this encourages her friend to whip off her bra??
January 5, 2008
An Unsupported Punchline
10 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
pajamas = comfortable, not professional
no bra = comfortable, not professional
I guess it’s one of those
if a = c and b = c, then a = b type things?
Comment by dd — January 5, 2008 @ 12:14 am
Apparently that stuff isn’t comfortable. Or so I hear…
Comment by Tim H — January 5, 2008 @ 12:21 am
This is kinda hot.
Comment by brien — January 5, 2008 @ 12:41 am
you men don’t know how we suffer. that’s all i’m saying.
Comment by laterain — January 5, 2008 @ 4:52 am
The underwire bra is a medieval torture device and I frequently whip mine off in the car on the ride home. While driving!
Comment by curlyq — January 5, 2008 @ 5:20 am
What Laterain said.
CurlyQ, you could earn money doing that. 😉
Comment by Keera — January 5, 2008 @ 5:35 am
Don’t question it — just enjoy the result.
Comment by Mike — January 5, 2008 @ 2:41 pm
Women don’t wear bras with pajamas.
Comment by Ellen — January 5, 2008 @ 10:45 pm
Fools rush in where …
… better to remain silent than to prove it
Comment by Frank — January 7, 2008 @ 7:15 pm
no no no–she intentionally came to work in PJ’s, pretended to this that they weren’t PJ’s to her boss to convince him they weren’t. and the bra thing, well if val could be comfy the reena (?) could too.
Comment by faith — June 9, 2008 @ 10:21 pm